灭顶之灾

International community should jointly reject and check Japanese right-wing forces’ dangerous pursuit: Chinese FM spokesperson_我的网站

A |     New Delhi, Oct 20 (UNI) Supreme Court declined to lift the ban on firecrackers and refused to hear the petition filed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader, Manoj Tiwari challenging the blanket ban on firecrackers in Delhi, after noting that let people breathe clean air and spend your money on sweets instead.

"Let the people breathe clean air, and spend your money on sweets instead," the Supreme Court's bench, headed by Justice M R Shah said, in his order and refused to lift the ban on firecrackers.

Lawyer Shashank Shekhar Jha, advocate appearing for Tiwari, had pleaded to the Supreme Court for lifting ban on firecrackers. He urged the Top that the Delhi government's order on blanket ban on firecrackers is a complete violation. So thereby this Court should pass appropriate order and direction in lifting the ban on firecrackers.

Jha also submitted to the Apex Court that this court had earlier allowed crackers without Barium Salt and green crackers. So this time also, this court should allow sort of similar directions and orders.

Jha also submitted to the Apex Court that the pollution is rising due to Parali (stubble burning) burning and other factors, but Justice Shah refused to hear it on urgent basis and said the Court would hear the petition later.

The BJP leader, Tiwari, had moved the Supreme Court challenging the blanket van order of the Delhi Government on firecrackers in Delhi. But after keeping in view the fact that the pollution level is not in levels, so declined to lift the ban on firecrackers.

Tiwari sought directions to the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government to issue fresh guidelines with regard to sale, purchase and bursting of permissible firecrackers during the upcoming festive season.

The BJP MP also sought directions to all States not to take any coercive action like lodging FIR against common people found selling or using permissible firecrackers.

"In the name of Right to life, freedom of religion cannot be taken away and that a balance has to be struck like that has been done through the decision of this Court dated October 29, 2021," submitted the plea filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey and Shashank Shekhar Jha.

In 2021, the Supreme Court had clarified there is no blanket ban on use of firecrackers and only those fireworks which contain barium salts are prohibited.

The Top Court had banned the usage of firecrackers which are found to be injurious to health while making it clear that there was no blanket ban on crackers and that people can include permissible firecrackers to celebrate their festival, the plea said.

The AAP government in Delhi on September 7 put a blanket ban on firecrackers with immediate effect in the capital till January 1, 2023.

UNI BAV SY GNK。    

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin JianThe "Enemy State Clauses" is an important provision of the UN Charter. As we mark 80 years of the Tokyo Trials, to reaffirm these clauses and underline their binding force is of particular importance for defending the outcomes of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War and thwarting the resurrection of militarism, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Wednesday.
On Monday, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov told the media that Japan was initially designated as an "enemy state" in the UN Charter. He sincerely hoped that Japan read the Charter in its entirety, including Article 107, namely the "Enemy State Clauses." Japan joined the UN after having atoned for its militaristic policies and the crimes it committed. By joining the UN, Japan recognized the principles enshrined in the Charter in their entirety. If the Japanese leaders are attempting to violate their own Constitution, rewrite international law, and evade historical responsibility, it will naturally give rise to serious concern. 
In response, Lin said that "China agrees with what Foreign Minister Lavrov said."
Lin noted that Japan needs to be reminded that instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender, stipulate Japan's international obligations as a defeated country and serve as cornerstones of the postwar international order. Fulfilling these obligations is the political and legal prerequisite for Japan to be readmitted to the international community.
"Today, however, the Takaichi administration keeps sidestepping the issue of historical crimes with no sign of remorse, and even goes to great lengths to whitewash and glorify them, as part of its scheme to abandon pacifism, break free from the constraints of its Constitution and domestic and international laws, and ratchet up remilitarization," Lin said.
"This is a blatant challenge to the postwar international order and a flagrant provocation to peace and justice. All peace-loving nations need to jointly reject and check Japanese right-wing forces' dangerous pursuit so as to safeguard the outcomes of WWII victory and the postwar international order and ensure that the tragedies of history will never be repeated," Lin said.
Global Times
。

Current article:http://rm3dg.wairanleichengwochengzhui.shop/list_cdbj8iz/fqqzm0.html

Published on:03:36:43